Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:41

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ancient miasma theory may help explain Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s vaccine moves - NPR
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Science news this week: Overdue earthquakes and star-shaped brain cells - Live Science
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Louisville earns College World Series trip with 3-2 win over Miami - Card Chronicle
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
A Japanese lander crashed on the Moon after losing track of its location - Ars Technica
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
My Girlfriend Had a Legendary Sex Life Before Me. No One Will Let Me Forget It. - Slate Magazine
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Angels To Promote Christian Moore - MLB Trade Rumors
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.